ComfyUIvsImgCompress
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ComfyUI | ImgCompress | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #8 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 143 773 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 036 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.43.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | release_0.9.0 · 21 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ComfyUI scores 93/100 against 53/100 for ImgCompress, so it is the safer default.
ComfyUI ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for ImgCompress.
If you want the quickest setup, ImgCompress is easier to run; ComfyUI needs more configuration.
ComfyUI is growing faster right now (+9 036 stars in 30 days).
ComfyUI details →ImgCompress details →
Swap a project
Keep ComfyUI, compare it with
Keep ImgCompress, compare it with