ColdsweatvsMiniflux
Two self-hosted Feed Reader projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coldsweat | Miniflux | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #69 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 9 854 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | 2.3.4 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | SCSS | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Miniflux scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Coldsweat, so it is the safer default.
Miniflux ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Coldsweat.
If you want the quickest setup, Miniflux is easier to run; Coldsweat needs more configuration.
Miniflux is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
Coldsweat details →Miniflux details →All Feed Reader projects →