CodyncvsRome
Two self-hosted Grok Bot alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Codync | Rome | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 120 in AI Assistant | #86 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 977 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.31.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | app-runtime-v0.9.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Codync scores 59/100 against 52/100 for Rome, so it is the safer default.
Codync ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Rome.
Codync details →Rome details → All Grok Bot alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Codync, compare it with
Keep Rome, compare it with