CodeX.docsvsscanopy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CodeX.docs | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Documentation Management | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 846 | 5 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 40 |
| Latest release | v2.2.5 · 15 Apr 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
scanopy scores 64/100 against 55/100 for CodeX.docs, so it is the safer default.
scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for CodeX.docs.
If you want the quickest setup, CodeX.docs is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.
scanopy is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
CodeX.docs details →scanopy details →