cobaltvsTailGuard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | TailGuard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #37 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 45 597 | 611 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 787 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.104.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Svelte | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 48/100 for TailGuard, so it is the safer default.
TailGuard ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; TailGuard needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 787 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →TailGuard details →