cloudberryvsfirebolt-core
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cloudberry | firebolt-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 40 in Database Management | #32 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 437 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.1.0-incubating · 6 May 2026 | v4.31.13-0.20260424104720.5698ca5339fc · 24 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
cloudberry scores 60/100 against 44/100 for firebolt-core, so it is the safer default.
firebolt-core ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for cloudberry.
cloudberry is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
cloudberry details →firebolt-core details →
Swap a project
Keep cloudberry, compare it with
Keep firebolt-core, compare it with