firebolt-corevsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firebolt-core | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.31.13-0.20260424104720.5698ca5339fc · 24 Apr 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 44/100 for firebolt-core, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for firebolt-core.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; firebolt-core needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
firebolt-core details →nocodb details →