CloakBrowservsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 32 572 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +214 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Torollo ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+214 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with