ClipForgevsDiscourse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ClipForge | Discourse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 1 123 | 48 028 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.9.12 · 26 Oct 2026 | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 57/100 for ClipForge, so it is the safer default.
ClipForge ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.
Discourse is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
ClipForge details →Discourse details →
Swap a project
Keep ClipForge, compare it with
Keep Discourse, compare it with