Clapervstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +260 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 49 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with