Clapervsprivate-gpt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | private-gpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 57 615 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +86 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |
Which one should you pick?
private-gpt scores 81/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
Claper ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.
If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; Claper needs more configuration.
private-gpt is growing faster right now (+86 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →private-gpt details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep private-gpt, compare it with