ChronoFramevsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.
Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with