ChronoFramevsYuxi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Yuxi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #44 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 7 538 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.2 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame and Yuxi score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Yuxi.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Yuxi needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Yuxi details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Yuxi, compare it with