ChronoFramevsytdlp_web_player
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | ytdlp_web_player | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.
ytdlp_web_player ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →ytdlp_web_player details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep ytdlp_web_player, compare it with