ChronoFramevsWealthfolio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Wealthfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 9 281 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +235 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Wealthfolio scores 73/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Wealthfolio ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
Wealthfolio is growing faster right now (+235 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Wealthfolio details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Wealthfolio, compare it with