ChronoFramevsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 38 609 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+634 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Trilium Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with