ChronoFramevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with