ChronoFramevsSerendipity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Serendipity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #7 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 229 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.6.1 · 22 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 53/100 for Serendipity, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Serendipity.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Serendipity needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Serendipity details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Serendipity, compare it with