ChronoFramevsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 41 189 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 838 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 838 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with