ChronoFramevsopenvpn_webpanel_manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | openvpn_webpanel_manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #50 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.0.1 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 39/100 for openvpn_webpanel_manager, so it is the safer default.
openvpn_webpanel_manager ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; openvpn_webpanel_manager needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →openvpn_webpanel_manager details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep openvpn_webpanel_manager, compare it with