chromavsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chroma | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vector Database | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 600 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +231 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | latest · 24 Jun 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
chroma scores 79/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for chroma.
If you want the quickest setup, chroma is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.
chroma is growing faster right now (+231 stars in 30 days).
chroma details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →