Chia NetworkvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Chia Network | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 795 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.7.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Chia Network and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Chia Network ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Chia Network is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Chia Network details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Chia Network, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with