chatwootvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 38 544 | 25 407 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 383 | +85 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 383 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →SpacetimeDB details →