chatwootvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 38 544 | 38 976 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 383 | +1 364 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot details →SearXNG details →