chatwootvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 38 572 | 35 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 411 | +511 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 14 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 411 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →qdrant details →