chatwootvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 38 507 | 92 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 385 | +57 929 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 35 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for chatwoot.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →OmniVoice-Studio details →