ChatGPT Next WebvsWhirl
Two self-hosted AI Chat projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 88 911 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →Whirl details →All AI Chat projects →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with