ChatGPT Next WebvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 88 911 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ChatGPT Next Web.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with