ChatGPT Next Webvssubatic
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | subatic | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #31 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 88 910 | 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 40/100 for subatic, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; subatic needs more configuration.
ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →subatic details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep subatic, compare it with