ChatGPT Next Webvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 88 910 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChatGPT Next Web scores 85/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ChatGPT Next Web.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
ChatGPT Next Web is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →magic-frame details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep magic-frame, compare it with