ChartDBvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 23 030 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with