ChartDBvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 93 035 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +1 288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with