ChartDBvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 23 031 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+81 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with