nocodbvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 65 379 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +317 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+317 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with