ChartDBvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 23 030 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with