qm-musicvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 114 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 547 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with