cephvstobab
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | tobab | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep tobab, compare it with