cephvsTinystatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | Tinystatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
ceph details →Tinystatus details →
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep Tinystatus, compare it with