cephvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
ceph details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with