CasdoorvsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Casdoor | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 14 691 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +227 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 123 | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.24.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Casdoor scores 78/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
Casdoor ships more often: 123 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Casdoor needs more configuration.
Casdoor is growing faster right now (+227 stars in 30 days).
Casdoor details →MQTTX Web details →
Swap a project
Keep Casdoor, compare it with
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with