MQTTX Webvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MQTTX Web | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 086 | 114 240 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +3 531 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 531 stars in 30 days).
MQTTX Web details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep MQTTX Web, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with