Carbonvssharebox
Two self-hosted Plex alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Carbon | sharebox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 14 in ERP | #48 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 778 | 28 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v5.1.0 · 20 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Carbon scores 60/100 against 38/100 for sharebox, so it is the safer default.
sharebox ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Carbon.
If you want the quickest setup, sharebox is easier to run; Carbon needs more configuration.
Carbon is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).
Carbon details →sharebox details → All Plex alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Carbon, compare it with
Keep sharebox, compare it with