capjsvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| capjs | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 78 in Security | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 205 | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +353 | +393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 27 |
| Latest release | standalone@3.1.13 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
capjs scores 72/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for capjs.
If you want the quickest setup, capjs is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
capjs details →SparkyFitness details →
Swap a project
Keep capjs, compare it with
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with