capjsvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| capjs | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 78 in Security | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 8 203 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +351 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 28 |
| Latest release | standalone@3.1.13 · 23 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 72/100 for capjs, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for capjs.
If you want the quickest setup, capjs is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
capjs details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep capjs, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with