Canonryvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Canonry | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 41 in Search Engines | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 194 | 35 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +529 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 14 |
| Latest release | v7.50.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 50/100 for Canonry, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Canonry.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).
Canonry details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep Canonry, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with