camofox-browservsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 18 785 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 63/100 for ZeroNet, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; ZeroNet needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with