camofox-browservsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with