camofox-browservswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with