camofox-browservswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with