camofox-browservsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with